42nd street

So here we are at near the beginning of movie musical history with the musical that saved the genre. 4 years after the first musical!! I find it quite amazing how an entire genre needed to be saved four years after its creation. Anyway the reason for the musical needed to be saved was that Al Jolson was so popular that studios started churning out 100’s of musicals and over saturated the market so people were sick of them. Until this movie came along and rekindled the people’s love of musicals. So how did this musical do that? How did it distinguish itself from all the other musicals? Does it still hold up? I don’t know but here’s my opinion.

Let’s start with the plot, Jones and Barry two theatre producers are putting on a show and they get famed musical director Julian Marsh to direct it despite the fact that he’s close to a nervous breakdown. They got the money from Abner Dillon who’s only request is that his girlfriend Dorothy Brock is the star which they do. Then it’s time for auditions where we meet Anytime Annie and Loraine Fleming who are musical veterans and in contrast we have Peggy Sawyer who’s trying to make it big in the city. The latter is made fun of by everybody but Annie and Lorraine take pity on her and get her into the show. She also manages to attract the juvenile lead Billy Lawler. So rehearsals start and it’s a little crap and to make matters worse Dorothy is cheating on Abner with Pat Denning which means if he finds out then everyone is fired. Dorothy breaks up with him anyway but for different reasons. But it’s too late, Marsh sends someone to take care of it but he’s on a sort of date with Peggy and he gets beaten up so Peggy tries to fix him up but ends up getting kicked out of her apartment so Pat lets him stay at her place. He then goes and gets a job in Philadelphia which coincidentally is where the musical opens. So everyone goes to Philadelphia and Dorothy is depressed because she thinks Peggy has stolen Pat. This leads her to break up with Abner and screw the whole show but he changes his mind and then she breaks her ankle after a fight with Peggy so they now have a show with no star. Abner tries to put forward her new girlfriend Annie but she insists that Peggy should be the star. Having little choice Marsh agrees to this and manages to coach Peggy in to being a star. She also admits her love for Billy and she’s a big hit and the film ends with Marsh quietly relishing his success with a cigarette. The script has a few minor potholes like why does Annie insist Dorothy should be the star when she could be the star?  Also about half the jokes fail miserably like Annie’s oh so witty comeback “It must have been hard for your mother never having any children” but half the jokes do work like while Peggy’s landlady is chewing her out for supposedly sleeping with Pat, you see a guy leaving a girl’s apartment behind her. So the comedy is a bit hit and miss but the musical does take good advantage of a show within a show angle where you see the musical come to life over the film but the whole process seems a bit rushed and a longer running time would have given us a lot more insight into the characters and the world of show business. So on the whole, the script kinda works but it could have been better from what I’ve read the stage musical based on this movie irons out a lot of the problems I have with the script so I’ll try and watch it and tell you what I think.

Now it’s time for the songs and before I get down into them individually, it’s quite annoying how 3 of the 5 songs we only get to hear in the last 10 minutes of the movie. Sure we get to see them rehearse bits of them throughout the movie but for a musical it just seems devoid of music. Let’s start with the title song 42^nd street; it’s quite a merry catchy little tune although Ruby Keeler murders the first couple verses but her dancing kinda makes up for it. It’s a very strange sequence, there’s a scene of domestic violence where someone dies and then it goes back to cheery dancing. I suppose it’s meant to be a metaphor that no matter what life throws at you, you’ve got to carry on and have fun and I suppose at the height of the depression that message would have had extra relevance. But I don’t know, it doesn’t really matter, it’s still a great song. Then we have you’re getting to be a habit with me which seems to have been covered by everyone and there’s a good reason for that it’s a great song but it’s also really adaptable. It can be a happy song, a sad song whatever it needs to be which reflects the paradoxical nature of love. But this version in particular is sung really well by Bebe Daniels who has quite an operatic quality to it and the dance sequence is a nice simple but comedic moment and all the dancers do a good job. Then we have it must be June which is deliberately bad, the choreography is terrible everyone’s singing of key and Annie are Lorraine are talking all the way through it. This song works because it basically shows how far they’ve come when you see the better songs and amazingly intricate dance sequences that come later.Then we have shuffle of to Buffalo which is quite a catchy tune but it requires some explanation when the guy says he needs to fetch his panties. It doesn’t mean that he has a fetish because apparently back then panties refereed to male underpants to but I don’t know Peggy gives him a pretty weird look when he says panties. Secondly when Loraine says they’ll soon be in Reno. She’s referring to the fact that Nevada had pretty lax divorce laws when compared to New York where if you wanted to get divorced, you’d need a picture of adultery or eyewitness testimony. In Nevada however you only had to live there 6 weeks and you could get divorced for any reason. But there are a couple of unexplained things about this song like why does Annie sat belly then change to tummy. It’s either a joke or she flubbed her line. Both is possible but I really don’t get the joke, I think it’s more likely she flubbed the line and because film was so expensive, it was probably thought best to keep the mistake in. Also I have no idea why they want to go to Buffalo. It’s still a good song and it’s probably the catchiest and the dance number is quite comedic and good. Ruby Keeler again can’t sing but Clarence Nordstrom has quite a sweet voice and it balances out on the side of good but it is helped by quite an amusing performance by Rodgers and Urkel. The last song is young and healthy which again is quite catchy but I think it’s quite clear where they went to Busby Berkley, ok you can do whatever you want with this song. The result is that it’s quite a trip to watch and some of it looks cg. I’m not sure whether I’m a fan of this sequence or if it’s a bit much but it’s certainly unforgettable.

 

Now let’s talk about the stars of this film which according to the cover of my box are Dick Powell and Ruby Keeler despite being billed 5^th and 8^th respectively. I have no idea why it’s laid out this way but I’m going to start with them because they are the stars of the show within a show and outside the show I don’t think anyone really stars. So let’s start with Ruby Keeler, first of all, she can’t sing, it’s pretty close to Hannah Montana bad. She just cannot get the right tone to save her life and it does bring down the rest of the movie a little bit. She is an excellent dancer and her quick feet make up for her voice coupled with the fact that they never let her sing a while song. Acting wise, she plays it a bit too wide eyed and it’s hard to believe anyone is this naive but she does manage to make you feel for her and you do end up liking her. Dick Powell is consistently good, his singing voice is excellent, he seems to avoid dancing and his acting is ok but it is a little flat, he just seems to have a limit to how much emotion he puts on his lines, in fairness these lines aren’t exactly Shakespeare but when you’re declaring you’re love for someone, I expect a little more than mild amusement. The romance is also problematic but their romance doesn’t feel organic, they barely have any scenes together and the ones they do have, their chemistry is ok but you don’t really feel a drive to see them together at end. This problem probably would have been fixed by a longer running time and allow them to actually establish a connection but alas.

Now we have the rest of the cast first we have Warner Baxter as the best musical director Julian Marsh and his desperation for one last hit is really quite moving and he plays all his scenes so well. At the end where he hears all those people criticise him, and he just lights his cigarette and smiles sadly and tries to figure out what the heck he should do now. It’s a powerful image to end the film on and in a lot of ways his journey is more engaging than Peggy’s. Then we have Bebe Daniels as Dorothy Brock who plays the part well, her voice is excellent and her drunken scenes are hilarious and when she gives her advice to Peggy at the end, it really gives a sense of passing the baton and there’s a real drama to it. Then we have George Brent as Pat Denning who kinda creeped me out which is a shame because he had the best lives but his emotional range was slightly sad to slightly happy and he just seemed robotic but I have to admit there are a couple of times where he comes across as charming but still creepy. Guy Kibnee as Abner Killon really does everything you expect him to, he’s a dirty, stupid but fortunately for him rich old man. Una Merkel and Ginger Rogers as Loraine and Anytime Annie do have a good chemistry and they have a few good lines, it’s just a shame you don’t get to see more of this friendship. Finally we have George E Stone as the dancing director Andy Lee who does a good job; he’s funny when he needs to be funny and serious when he needs to be serious. I don’t know what his deal is with Lorraine. She’s either his girlfriend or she’s blackmailing him, I honestly have no idea again it’s something I would have liked to have seen explored more.

 

Finally we have the special features we have 3 short films, one focuses on Harry Warren, the composer of this film. It has him playing some of his songs with his presumed guests singing them and they’re all ok. Next we have the Hollywood news reel which is a news reel about the various star of Hollywood but the fact that everything that happens is clearly staged means there’s no actual news but hey if you want to see a football team get praised and Dick Powell looking for gold then this is the special feature for you. The best special feature is a trip through Hollywood while it’s as staged as the news reel, it’s really good and it tells you a lot of interesting facts about how they made movies back then and how a scene went from script to screen. There’s also a very amusing bit when they’re in the casting office and this little girl says “I haven’t got any work for three days” well it’s the depression kid. Lastly we have a trailer not for this film but for the James Dean collection which I guess could inspire you to buy it if you liked James Dean, it seemed to have loads of special features on it so I guess it’s worth it. So on the whole if you like this movie and want a bit of an insight into 30’s cinema then I’d buy the DVD.

To conclude, I do like this film, it’s flawed but it manages to tell a good story in its 89 minutes and the songs are good. The idea of a show looking at the backstage of a show is a genius concept; it allows people to see the work and effort that go into creating what they love. The feeling of profound optimism despite being surrounded by despair is a very pertinent theme especially back then. It’s clear that the depression exists outside of this show but while this show is going it doesn’t matter, it offers hope and escape for the fictional and the real audience. I can understand why people loved this film but the jokes certainly haven't aged well and the acting could be better. But this is an enjoyable movie and it’s worth watching for its historical value if nothing else.

Royal Wedding or Wedding Bells

Do you remember that cheap made to DVD film that exploited the fanfare around Prince William and Kate Middleton’s wedding? Sure you do, it was in every supermarket throughout the country and it was atrociously bad but that wasn’t the first time the film industry has taken advantage of the royal family. Yes today we’re reviewing Royal Wedding which thankfully only uses the royal wedding between Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip as a backdrop but I have to admit, it would have been funny to see that story in the form of a musical. Plus unlike the Will and Kate DVD, this was made by MGM who have more than a passing familiarity with actual talent which the former lacked. Even though the tagline’s a bit unfortunate “MGM’s Gayest Technicolor Musical.” Now I know that Gay meant something completely different back in 1951 but it’s another indicator that this film hasn’t aged well.

 

So let’s start with the plot because it’s relatively simplistic. Tom and Ellen Bowen played by Fred Astaire and Jane Powell are a successful brother and sister dancing act on Broadway and then they get called to move their show to the west end for the royal wedding. They’re both delighted by this and go right away with Ellen quickly disposing of two disposable love interests before she gets on the boat. Luckily her love interest Lord John Brindale has also disposed of his two disposable love interests so they’re both free to fall in love, aahh.  They arrive in London and Tom Bowen finds his love interest Anne Ashmond played by Sarah Churchill and conveniently she’s dancing in the show but darn it she still has her disposable love interest but luckily he’s in Chicago which means they can still go out. He can also hang out with her dad and get him back together with her mum. Meanwhile Ellen and John are falling in love.  They have their show and it’s a success despite Tom skipping out on a few rehearsals because of Anne. Tom also decides if Anne’s not going to get rid of her disposable love interest then darn it, he’s going to do it so he asks his British agent to deal with it who’s played by Keenan Wynn who calls the American agent also played by Keenan Wynn, they’re twins you see, to make some inquiries. It turns out that Anne’s disposable love interest got married which means he is disposed. So Tom tells her this and she takes it quite well and tells him that they’re in love. The same thing happens with Ellen and John so Tom and Ellen meet up and decide that they should stick to their careers. So they go to the royal wedding and the sight of it makes them spontaneously decide to get married there and then so they do and everyone lives happily ever after. If you haven’t got it from the sarcasm the plot is terrible, it’s vacuous and there are very few genuinely funny lines and even when the script delivers, it’s a very small laugh. There’s also the pothole of why Anne needs Tom to get rid of her disposable interest, he hasn’t talked to her in two months now I live in the Skype generation but seriously, she never once called him or if that didn’t work call at his work. It makes her look either lazy or stupid depending on your point of view but neither of the couples are given much of a chance to make it believable that they’re falling in love, they just do and you’re meant to accept it.

Now the songs and dances, now I don’t know if this was down to Astaire or if the filmmakers but the songs don’t really seem that developed, they seem to exist solely to justify the dance sequences which are all quite good. When I looked Astaire up on Wikipedia, it said he didn’t believe, he could sing well, so maybe that’s the reason but regardless, the songs are a bit superfluous and it’s meant to be a musical. Too Late now is easily the best song in the movie, it was nominated for an Oscar and you can see why, it’s a genuinely sweet song and Jane Powell puts a lot of punch into it with her quite high pitched voice.. The melody is sweet and it’s the only time on the movie that I bought the Ellen and John romance. Next we have the opening song Every Night at seven which is just ok. The music is ok but forgettable and the dance/comedy sequence is quite good but the song itself just isn’t that interesting, it just doesn’t have the punch and excitement that an opening number is meant to have and Fred Astaire doesn’t really sing it with that much conviction. Sunday jumps isn’t a song so much as a dance sequence and it’s one of the sequences which this film is famous for and that is Fred Astaire dancing with a coat stand, It really does show of Fred Astaire’s amazing dancing talent and that’s about it. The we have Open your eyes and while Jane Powell does sing, it’s just another dance sequence, it’s quite an impressive waltz but it doesn’t have the energy of the Sunday jumps dance sequence, to inject some comedy into this dance sequence the ship’s rocking them about unfortunately it isn’t funny but it’s still a nice waltz. Then we have the happiest day of my life which isn’t a dance sequence and it’s quite a nice song. Powell’s voice as I’ve mentioned is quite high pitched but once you get used to it’s an ok song. Next we have the second sequence called You’re all the world to me which is the only unoriginal song in the movie but it makes up for that by having a quite spectacular dance sequence. The verse of the song he sings is sung with real emotion and it really does capture the giddiness of falling in love and of course Fred Astaire dancing on the ceiling. It’s a really clever sequence and I don’t think it could be done that much better today, it looks amazing and it links with the theme of the song about the giddiness of falling in love. Next we have I left my hat in Haiti and the whole song is long, pointless and repetitive. 

The dancing is good but it just feels like more of the same and in regards to the dancing it reminded me of Nina for the pirate and that dance sequence was a lot better. Then we have what a lovely day for a wedding which I would have used for the opening, it’s a short but cheery song and it really captures the festive mood and would have been a better mood setter. Then we have the longest song title ever How could you believe me when I said I loved you when you know I’ve been a liar all my life. This is the only song that manages to be funny and I think that’s largely to Astaire’s scenery chewing  but it also shows both character’s cynicism towards love and illustrates where they are at this point. On the whole most of the songs are forgettable and serve only as a justification for the dances with a couple of exceptions.

Now let’s talk about the actors in this film. Firstly we have Fred Astaire who plays Tom Bowen who is a dedicated dancer and that’s about it, there are times where he comes across as slightly charming but most of the time he just comes across as normal. Then we have Jane Powell playing Ellen Bowen now that casting decision has an interesting history apparently the first actress got pregnant, the second was Judy Garland who got fired and then Ellen Powell and she does an ok job throughout this film, she has some comedic talent but she’s fighting the writing on that score and while her voice does take a while to get used to when you do, it’s quite a sweet voice and she manages to keep up with Fred Astaire. Apparently Astaire was 30 years older than Powell which puts a strain on believability that their siblings but they counteract this with some great chemistry, their sibling reactions seem real, the way they tease each other, moan at each other and it seems very real. Sarah Churchill plays Anne Ashmond and she does an ok job even though she seems really bland, the only thing you’re going to remember about her is the accent. Which is better than Peter Lawford’s Lord John because you will not remember this character apart from maybe his whistling of too late now, he’s just there. The agents both played by Keenan Wynn annoy me,  both of them have these atrocious over the top accents which I’m pretty sure is meant to be a joke but I just found it annoying. Then finally we have Albert Sharpe who plays James Ashmond and give him credit, his role is small but he manages to be consistently funny which in this film says a lot.

Now finally the special features, there are none if you buy this DVD all you’re getting is the menu, this is quite annoying because this film is in public domain so there’s no point in buying the DVD, there’s even a link to the movie on IMDB. But there is one thing I’d like to address, the DVD quality is terrible, the credits won’t stop shaking, there are flickers, scratch and the whole film seems washed out now I know this film is old. But I didn’t have this problem with the pirate or even older than that three smart girls. This film clearly hasn’t been given the tender loving care it needs but apparently there’s a remastered version of this film so it might be worth buying that but when I looked at a review of it they experienced the same problems I had with my copy so it might be a waste of money. All I know is you don’t need a HD TV to enjoy this movie. Although not technically a special feature this film has actual colour footage of Prince Phillip’s and Queen Elizabeth’s wedding so if you’re into that kind of thing.

To conclude, this is probably, the worst film, I’ve reviewed so far and that’s not to say it’s bad, it’s just boring and so many things about it annoy me like why is Lord John different from all of Ellen’s other boyfriends? Why does Anne never bother trying to contact her fiancée or at least discover what’s happened to him? Why do the two agents have completely different accents if they’re brothers? This film could have been great, the premise is ok but the writing has let it down and the fact that the brilliant dancing sequences are sometimes hard to make out really highlight that. I don’t recommend buying this film but if you like dance sequences and can put up with the picture quality then you should definitely download it.    

Bride and Prejudice

So far in this blog I’ve only looked at American musicals but America isn’t the only one making musicals. Yes it’s time for me to tackle the behemoth of musical cinema that is Bollywood. Kind of. Bride and Prejudice is not just a Bollywood film, the director Gurinder Chadha whilst being of Indian origin grew up in the UK and quite a lot of funding for this film comes from the UK film Council which means most of the filming was done in UK and it was inspired by a British novel. So we have a British/ Bollywood production. Well no, because there is a little bit of America in this film as well. To sum up what the director Gurinder Chadha has tried to do is to take three different cultures and put them in a blender to see what would happen. The result is either a mess or a daring masterpiece depending on your point of view.

 

Firstly the actors, we’re going to start with the 2 main stars Aishwarya Rai and Martin Anderson. Aishwarya Rai blew me away in this role and although I’d never heard of her before this. She certainly made an impression. She was perfect as Lalita, she conveyed her emotions perfectly and all you could do was emphasise with her, she doesn’t have many funny moments but the ones she does have work quite well. She just has this aura of independence even when she’s down and out in take me to love part 1. She still manages to convey a feeling of strength that no matter what happens she’s going to get through this and that’s inspiring. Now we move on to Mr Darcy played by Martin Henderson and he wasn’t perfect. He’s quite handsome but I don’t know he struggles to be charming, now in fairness in the beginning of the movie, he’s out of his element but I don’t know he never really recovers and he never quite becomes the romantic hero he’s meant to be. I’ve seen reviews which really bash their chemistry but I think towards the end of the film you do get some sparks between them but it takes a while to get there and even then it’s not exactly mind-blowing. It’s quite disappointing that the romance doesn’t really take of but it works just enough that the rest  of the film can make up for it.

Now the rest of the cast, help to bring a lot of humour and heart to this movie and there’s a lot of them so let’s get going firstly we have Mrs Bakshi played by Nadira Babbar who is hilarious and at the same time quite loveable in that you know she only does what she does for her children. It’s just a shame she manages to embarrass herself and her children while doing it. Then you have Mr. Bakshi who does a good job, he has a few funny lines and gives a solid performance. Now onto the beta couple Jaya (Jane) and Bhalraj (Bingley). These two have very few moments together but the ones they do are very concentrated and you get immediately that they’re falling in love. Then we have Wickham played by Daniel Gillies who’s handsome, British and a dick and Kiran (Miss Bingley) played by Indira Varma who’s attractive, British and a bitch. I don’t know I never quite got what her deal was. She never seemed to be actively trying to seduce Darcy like she was in the novel and she doesn’t appear to oppose her brother’s and Jaya’s relationship. I suppose it doesn’t really matter but she does have a couple good laughs and surprisingly enough there’s actually a hint of affection between her and her brother which I don't think I’ve seen in any other Pride and Prejudice adaption.
Then we have Chandra (Charlotte) played by Sonali Kulkaneri who does a good job as the cynical best friend but despite this she still seems likeable and you want her to do ok and then we have Mr Kholi “Collins” who is hilarious from his star and stripes thong to his eating at the dinner table and unlike the books does come across as ok. He’s not perfect but he’s a decent guy and I’m kind of glad, they got rid of his pathological need to please Catherine de Bourgh or Catherine Darcy in this case. Then we have the other Bakshi sisters, Maya (Mary) played by Meghna Kothari who does a pretty impressive snake dance and that’s about it. But we also have Lakhi (Lydia) who’s the bad Bakshi daughter, her performance is a bit over the top but it was probably what the character needed considering her screen time. Lastly we have the Darcys who are incredibly disappointing Georgina who is played by Alexis Beddel plays the role as if she’s stoned. I suppose Marsha Mason does a better job as Catherine Darcy now Darcy’s mother and not his aunt but I don’t know in other versions, she’s this  grand imposing figure and I don’t know in this she’s certainly snobbish but she never gives of that feeling of power that other versions have given of.

 

The script which as I mentioned before is based on the ever popular Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. The script takes meticulous care in trying to follow the novel as closely as possible whilst bollywoodising names. Lizzy becomes Lalita, the Bennets become the Bashes and so on and so on. There's also quite a cool action sequence added where Darcy and Wickham confront each other. It’s quite amazing how well the plot fits it new setting to the point where I think Austen would emphasise with the problems modern Indian girls face. But if for some reason you don't know the basic story of a novel, here's a summary. Boy meets girl. Girl dislikes boy. Boy fancies girl. Boy declares himself. Girl shoots him down. Girl gets to know boy and she realises she was wrong about him. Girl falls in love with boy and they live happily ever after. But the script does have some problems for one it seems to have an agenda that I don’t agree with that anyone who comes to India must immerse themselves in Indian culture and it’s disrespectful to India to stay in a 5 star hotel because if you don’t you won’t experience the “real India.” Also it gives Lalita another best friend but they don’t do anything with and Jaya and Bhalraj’s relationship seems a bit rushed but these are just nitpicks and on the whole the script is funny and exudes a genuine warmth especially the points that deal with family.

The direction in this film is really good, some of the shots are like being attacked by a rainbow and it’s clear that Chadha just threw everything she could at this film resulting in something that’s incredibly colourful but it never becomes garish. The film has plenty of quiet peaceful moment which offers a great contrast to the big loud moments like when Jaya(Jane) is comforting Lizzie after she learns that Darcy ruined Jaya’s chances of marrying Bhalraj (Mr Bingley) . I think I should give a shout out to the family scenes which were really good. Despite none of the Bakshis really looking alike you really bought that they were a family. One small moment is at the beginning where Lakhi (Lydia) is mouthing what her mum is saying as she says it and just little looks and glances throughout the film give the family, a real credibility. So is the direction a bit over top, at times yes but Chadha knows that, she’s having fun with it and you feel like you should do the same.

 

Now it’s time to talk about the songs which make up this musical. First of all we have the Punjabi wedding song. This song sets the tone for the rest of the movie it’s loud,  it has over the top dance sequences and it’s about the difficulty and pleasure of falling in love. It’s a great introduction to the film because it states what this movie is about and if you don’t like it you can leave. Next we have A marriage has come to town which despite being sung completely in English manages to be more Indian than its predecessor, watching this song is like being attacked by a rainbow and it’s glorious. It’s a joyful song but it still manages to be bittersweet at times although the bride is happy that she’s getting married, she’s still sad about the life she’s leaving behind. If there’s one complaint I have about the song is that we don’t see the bride again after she’s married and it goes against the point of the song and I don’t see why the created this subplot if they weren’t going to use it. Next we have My lips are waiting aka Goa groove which according to Chadha follows in the tradition of many Bollywood films of having a famous glamorous celebrity normally female sing a song and then leave. This song was sung by Ashanti who does look pretty stunning, it does seem a bit over the top for a cameo but who am I to judge Indian film traditions. This song does a good job of setting up the background to the flirtation between Wickham and Lalita and to give the impression that this is a pretty cool concert seriously I want to go to one of these things. Then we have Dola Dola which covers arguably the most important moment in the novel Darcy’s and Lizzy’s first dance this is the moment where their amazing chemistry comes to the fore but she hates him. It doesn’t quite happen that way in this film, they basically seem like two people who are becoming increasingly frustrated with each other and there just isn’t a hint of sexual tension here and this is the one moment when you need it. The choreography is still good though and the song is ok but it’s only meant to be background and the whole thing is a bit lacking. Next we have the first quiet song take me to love part 1 since the first few songs have been so colourful and loud. It was a welcome contrast to have this quiet little number with a quiet unassuming montage to establish everything you need to know and really let the emotion come through. It helps that Aishwarya Rai has a very powerful but gentle voice and with a simple guitar melody this song is a breath of fresh air. Next we have my favourite song in the whole movie no life without wife.  It’s just perfect. It’s upbeat, it’s funny and has some great interactions between the sisters. It’s catchy. I just love this song and it sums up perfectly the message of pride and prejudice. I also love the dream sequence at the end, it’s probably a bit over indulgent on Chadha’s part but sometimes you’ve just got to indulge. Next we have the cobra dance which isn’t really a song but it’s definitely a funny dance sequence and I’ll leave it at that. Now we have take me to love part 2 which instead of being about despair about never finding love this about the joy of finding love and there is a feeling of jubilation. It’s quite infectious and the gospel choir certainly gives the song a lot of energy, it’s a good song and this time I do feel some chemistry and it feels like they’re falling in love. So they’re the songs and most of them seem like, they live in their own little world and completely devoid of reality. But in this case that’s actually good thing, it allows the film to take on a pure dream like feeling and what is Pride and Prejudice if it’s not one girl’s fantasy.

Now onto special Features and if you like special features, buy this DVD because there’s a ton. Firstly we have deleted scenes, they are a couple of good Bakshi scenes which while not being that funny really showed the inner workings of this family, it’s a shame but I can see why they were cut.  We have a scene in Goa which would have made Kiran’s motivations where she explicitly states that her parents would be devastated if Bhalraj and Jaya got together. A verse of take me to love part 2 with Darcy singing. Martin Henderson has a good voice but I don’t know it seems wrong for him to be singing, this is Lalita’s song. They’re both falling in love but she’s the one making the discovery of it.  Then we have Catherine’s Confrontation with Elizabeth, in the novel, it’s a powerful scene where Lizzie stands up for herself and says to possibly one of the richest women in the country to f off. In this movie I don’t know the whole reaction seems a little wooden and it doesn’t have the weight thes moment is meant to have. 

Then we have a scene between Darcy and the Bhalrajs where we actually get a hint that Karan might be interested in Darcy but he’s too focused on her brother. Anyway he tells Bhalraj that he shouldn’t have told her to break up with Jaya and Bhalraj says that he couldn’t face up to seeing her again. His scene whilst interesting meant that for it to work you’d have to invest more time in the Jaya/ Bhalraj relationship which would have hurt the film’s pacing and took focus on the main element. Then we have the deleted song Arrogance, Pride and Vanity which just doesn’t work like a lot of portion in this film it looks pretty but the, the melody is ok but the lyrics are atrociously bad like “What a waste God had to make her so pretty.” Lines like that really make Darcy seem like a sexist prick but the montage actually makes him come across a lot better, he’s shown actually interacting with Indian culture and lightening up a little bit. Then we have a making of which really highlights how ambitious this project was and all the elements that went into making it. There are also featurettes which go into more detail, my personal favourite being the one on choreography, this woman is talented but she is phenomenally scary. Then we have some really funny outtakes that follow on from the ones that were in the credits. A commentary with Gurinder Chadha and Paul Mayed Berges the writer which is quite funny and does show some insight into the making of this film like how you can make a Spanish restaurant in London look like a Mexican restaurant in LA. We also have footage from the UK premiere where you get to see some of the producers including the inspiration for Mr. Kholi. We have two trailers, the theatrical and teaser trailer. A funny video of the crew doing the Punjabi wedding song which was done in 3 minutes despite the first version taking 6 days. There’s a gallery with some nice pictures and also apparently production notes and cast biographies now I couldn’t find a way to access them but you should be able to access them on your computer.

To conclude is this film perfect? No not by a long stretch but I have to applaud the vision of Gurinder Chadha. Now I would have done things differently but I doubt I could have done this. So I applaud her initiative to bring Bollywood more into the mainstream in the UK, to try add American musical influences but also trying to keep it a British film. It’s a tough balancing act. Also you have to remember, this came right after bend it like Beckham which was a resounding success for her. She could have done a sequel, she could have stayed making those kind of movies but she made this, something big, bright and unique and in a film industry where we’re seeing more remakes and sequels. I applaud that creativity but crucially does it work and it’s a pity it didn’t inspire anyone to do something similar but maybe that’s a good thing, maybe something like this should stay unique. Does it mix three cultures and still have a comprehensible film? On the whole I think the answer is yes.

Jane Eyre - A non musical review

Hey there fellow bloggers. Here I am again with a review of the latest Jane Eyre movie directed by Cary Fukunaga. First of all I’ve looked at other reviews of this movie who’ve said Jane Eyre was my favorite book and I’ve seen every adaption there is. I can’t claim that level of expertise but I have read the book and I saw the 2006 version with Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens both of these I liked quite a lot. So I knew I had to see this film just so I could compare to the 2006 version to see if the story could have been done better. However this film seems like a pale ghost in comparison which was quite disappointing.

The plot of Jane Eyre is quite simple girl has crappy life. Girl falls in love with boy. Boy has dark secret past. Girl leaves boy. Girl goes back to boy and they live happily ever after and this film doesn’t mess with that premise and hits the majority of plot points that the novel has. This is actually a bit disappointing, the film doesn’t do anything new with the plot when I first heard that the film was starting at the point where Jane is found by Mr Rivers. I thought great, they’re going to tell the story in a different way. But they didn’t do anything interesting with it. Jane just flashbacks the story as she’s staying at rivers’ house and this really takes a lot of drive out of the narrative because we keep cutting back to her with the rivers and to be honest that wasn’t the most exciting moment of the book. It takes a lot of energy out of the narrative to have to cut back to Jane having an awkward dinner conversation with the Rivers. It also doesn’t help that because this film is only 90 minutes so they had to cut a lot from the novel, to the point where the film seems almost skeletal. This is especially apparent with the ending, this film doesn't end it stops abruptly. I remember, my sister going to me "Is that it?." Unfortunately that was it and 

The direction of this film was quite disappointing to. Now I’d never heard of Cary Fukunaga before this movie but apparently he’s an award wining director. This was why I was disappointing that this film wasn’t that visually interesting. Now don’t get me wrong, there were a couple of visually interesting shots and the costumes and locations were very good but so was the 2006 version which was made for television. On the whole the film felt  very washed out and dull. Also another funny flaw with the directing I found was the scene where Mr Mason played by Harry Lloyd has been injured by his sister and Jane is looking after him except, she gets up and goes to listen at the tapestry. Now i’m sure this scene was meant to be creepy but all I was thinking was what’s Mr Mason doing right now. “Come back, I’m bleeding, I’m in incredible pain.” I don’t know it just seems a bit silly to me to get up and leave your patient after such a grievous wound. I don’t know maybe the wound wasn’t that bad and she was trying to protect him but I don’t know it just came across like she had a very short attention span.

Now the couple, let’s start with Jane both of them. Firstly young Jane played by Amelia Clarkson. Now then the bit with child Jane as far as I know has never been cut out of an adaptation because despite this seemingly being a love story, it’s also a rocky type movie in that we see someone down and out realize their true potential. So the bits with child Jane are really important to get right this is where we emphasize with Jane and become invested in her story. We want her to do well. We want her to escape. Which is why I don’t understand why they got an actress who was just so wooden, she didn’t seem like a child. She seemed like a robot and I couldn’t bring myself to care about her which is a big failing because it takes a lot of the driving force out of the movie. Now grown up Jane who’s played by Mia Wasikowska and I feel a little bad criticizing her performance because she’s not in the best of positions. She’s got to make up for the flaws of young Jane and make me care but mostly she doesn’t. She gives such a low key and passionless performance throughout this film that it’s hard to understand why anyone would fall in love with her. She just plays it so bland that it made me pine for Ruth Wilson. I will be fair that at various points of the film. There is a faint glimmer of a spark that made me fall in love with the character of Jane Eyre. But these moments are few and far between and it doesn’t carry the movie. 

Now the Mr Rochester played by Michael Fassbender and I’ll admit when I heard that he was playing Rochester I was pumped. But largely he didn’t deliver now then he was a lot better than Mia Wasikowska but then again that might be because he was consistently showing signs of life and he played the rough, dark side of Rochester quite well but not the charming lovable side, he reminded me of Edward Cullen always moping about how dark and dangerous he is. What a  prima dona. This is especially frustrating because I saw him in X men First class and there he had that charming roguishness needed for this part. Finally the chemistry between Jane and Mr Rochester which was severely lacking throughout this film, there was only one moment where I felt any heat and that was after the wedding. But the rest of the film I didn’t get the feeling of two people falling in love just two people being polite to each other. Considering this is meant to be a love story, it really drags down the movie.

I feel I should give a shout out to some of the other actors in this movie but only two really stood out for me. One Judi Dench who plays Miss Fairfax, I had to comment on this performance just because it’s Judi Dench. To be honest I’m kind of surprised she accepted this role. Now the film took great pains to expand her character to make it worth her effort and she does have some good moments. My personal favorite being her standing on the staircase as she watches Jane and Mr Rochester. But the problem is with Mrs Fairfax is she’s not an important character. They tried to mould her into a mother figure for Jane and it just doesn’t work.The other part is Sally Hawkins played by Mrs Reed. It’s a huge testament to her that she stood out after being on screen for 2 minutes tops but she does really well playing the strained Mrs Reed. It’s restrained but she lets you see the subtle cracks behind her mask of her propriety. To be honest it’s a real shame that her part got cut down so much to the point where she really just serves to move the plot but she did manage to shine for her few brief scenes and i was grateful for that.

To conclude this film is boring, it does occasionally show flickers of promise but they quickly subside and leave you with a bore of a film where you don’t care about Jane, you don't care about the love story and after that there’s nothing left. So if you’re a fan of Jane Eyre watch the 2006 version, the acting is better, the story is more developed and the character development feels more organic. For me it’s the definitive adaptation.

Gentlemen prefer Blondes

So this is a film that when I picked it up. I had a subconscious reaction, I vaguely knew of its existence but I knew had never watched it. I had pretty much the same reaction to everyone on the cover Howard Hawks, Jane Russell and Charles Coburn. They were people I knew existed but I couldn’t have named anything they’d done. The exception to this is Marilyn Monroe and even today around 50 years later is still the ultimate blonde style icon. So one of the things I was asking when watching this film was can Marilyn Monroe actually act, I only really knew her for being an icon and although I was aware of her being an actress, I’d never seen her act so this was interesting in that respect.

Let’s start with the plot, Lorelai Lee and Dorothy Shaw are two presumably successful showgirls who are looking to find love and get married. So Lorelai’s fiancée pay for them to go to Europe unfortunately for him. Lorelai was born with the most advanced diamond tracking system in the world and ends up being attracted by Piggy, who owns the 2^nd biggest diamond mine in Africa. He’s probably set up at least two military coups and caused the death of thousands but stuff like this doesn’t bother Lorelai.   Because to Lorelai, love is great and all but diamonds are a girl’s best friend.  Dorothy who having no luck with the Olympic team falls for private detective Ernie Malone but unfortunately for her, he’s been hired by Lorelai’s fiancé’s father to keep an eye on Lorelai and tell him of any scandal. Unfortunately for Lorelai it seems that letting a guy grab you as he pretends to be a python and flirting with the same man to get a tiara cputns as a scandal. So he decides to cut her off, so both girls, betrayed by the men they love, decide to sing their ticket home in a nice Parisian club presumably that’s their goal, it’s not actually made clear. Piggy’s wife however wants her tiara back but it’s been stolen back by Piggy. The race is on to get the money, whilst Dorothy tries to sort this out in court. Ernie Malone decides to help her because money’s great and all but he’s got a chance of checking out her rocks, so he switches sides. The tiara is returned and we end on a double wedding. There are plenty of funny moments throughout this movie but at the same time there are a few jokes that just don’t work for example “sometimes I think there’s only one of you in the whole world”. But the plot does deliver some good laughs and the movie manages a quite relaxed pace despite it’s running time of 87 minutes.

But let’s not forget that this is a musical so let’s look at the songs in this film, first we have “two little girls from Littlerock”, a catchy little number and sung brilliantly by our two stars. The song does a good job of establishing the friendship but also the immense differences between the two leads. Jane Russell sings in a way that she knows she’s entertaining and she doesn’t take what she’s singing seriously meanwhile Marilyn Monroe sings a lot more seductively and while she’s having fun, she’s still actively working her assets to impress Gus Esmond. “Bye Bye baby” is even catchier than “two little girls from Littlerock” and again emphasises the differences between the two leads Dorothy is just flirting meanwhile Lorelai is trying to comfort Gus and convince him that she won’t cheat. Then we have "ain’t there anyone here for love" which is a very funny song with the Olympic team dancing in flesh coloured swimming trunks ahhhhh, the homo eroticism. But Russell dominates this song with her amazing comedic expressions and plain voice and pretty much set up her character’s motivations throughout the rest of the movie. Then we have “when love goes wrong, nothing goes right” which is unique throughout this movie because it’s the only song that doesn’t try and be funny again it’s sung beautifully but whereas the other songs Dorothy and Lorelai sing together emphasise how different they are. This one focuses on how similar they are. Lorelai’s not trying to impress anyone and Dorothy’s not having fun anymore. They’ve both been hurt by love but as the song goes on there is an air of hope even if they don’t have engagement rings they have a love for entertaining and ironically as they start to sing things start to go right for them. Love may go wrong but music never does. God that was corny. Last but certainly not least is diamonds are a girl’s best friend which is without a doubt the most well known song in this movie. It is fantastically staged and costumed with a great pink and black theme to which I really have to nod my head to the director. "Ain’t there anyone here for love" gave us a look into Dorothy’s character and this song does the same for Lorelai. It’s basically her whole philosophy, why should she bother with love when she can have diamonds and love, she’s not going to live forever and she just wants to enjoy life while she can and you can’t blame her. Later on Jane Russell reprises the song brilliantly and it makes fun of this philosophy that Lorelai is basically ok to sell herself to the highest bidder. So there is no song that I dislike and each song and adds great emotional depth to the plight of our stars

So let’s talk about the two main stars Jane Russell and Marilyn Monroe. According to IMDB when Marilyn was told she wasn’t the star of this film she said “Well whatever I am, I’m still the blonde” and that pretty much sums up her character. She’s extremely blonde from her simpering voice; her doe eyed expression and her quite generous curves. By all rights, I should hate this character, I’ve grew up in an age where the blonde bimbo was nothing but an object of ridicule in most movies especially when the blonde is only after money, which but I don’t hate this character. You can’t hate Lorelai in this film, what she says throughout makes sense; I especially love her honesty at the end “I want your money.” She also delivers all her lines in this soft simpering voice and while it should be annoying it just isn’t, it adds a whole extra layer of comedy to her already funny lines and she is just so iconic throughout this film, she also emotes quite well and she has little expressions that add something to her performance like how she tries to smile when Dorothy invites the Olympic team to her room. However I preferred Jane Russell’s character Dorothy, She just has a no nonsense attitude and she delivers her lines brilliantly, one of my personal favourites is “no one chaperones the chaperone” and she’s such a perfect contrast to Lorelai. She’s not trying to find a rich husband she just wants to fall in love and have fun and she’s quite successful at doing this although they are a few mishaps. I just fell in love with her care free attitude but also her fierce determination to look after her friend. Russell and Monroe have a great chemistry together and you really believe these two are really good friends which really sells the movie.

The supporting cast is also brilliant, the two love interests do a brilliant job of being more than bland love interests, and Elliot Reis plays the wisecracking private dick Ernie Malone with such style that you can’t help but love him. Yes he’s here to bring down Lorelai but he’s only doing his job and his down to earth attitude and dry wit makes him a perfect match for Dorothy because they just want love. On the other hand we have 

Tom Noonan playing Gus Esmond who gets the amazing fortune to play opposite Marilyn Monroe. He does a pretty good job and unlike everyone else it never seems like he’s lusting after her but that he’s just madly in love and his reactions during "bye bye baby" are just brilliant and he manages to convey that he is genuinely worried about her. He doesn’t want anything to happen to her. Charles Coburn didn’t really impress me in this film, he does an ok job but he’s really only there as a plot device and isn’t very interesting. The real scene stealer is George Winslow as Henry Spoford the 3^rd. This kid is amazing, I love his dead pan voice, his dead pan expression and just about everything this kid does. He’s only in two scenes but he just steals them completely. The way he says you’ve got a lot of animal magnetism with no passion just makes the line all the more funny. This kid is either a comedic genius or a really crap actor. I really can’t figure this kid out.

Lastly special features, well we’ve got the trailer which is good. A film of Monroe and Russell signing their names in cement which is good if you like watching celebrities write their name in cement. We also have a small feature about the restoration of this movie which I don’t recommend unless you’re really interested in film restoration. Lastly we have two pictures which I assume were movie posters and they look quite nice. So yeah, the special features really aren’t worth buying the DVD.

To conclude Gentlemen prefer blondes satirises high society and also points out the hypocrisy in a system that looks down on women for only wanting money, when there are men that want women because of their looks. But first and foremost, this is a comedy about love, how much it hurts, how much fun it is. But if this film had a message I think it would be figure out what you want and go for it. But this film is mainly about fun and you’ll be humming the songs for weeks and that’s what it’s all about.